Circular Reasoning
Also known as: Begging the question, Circular logic
A guide to circular reasoning, begging the question, and how LogicLens can help readers notice arguments that assume what they need to prove.
What it means
Circular reasoning happens when the argument's conclusion is already assumed inside the reasons offered for it.
Why it matters
Circular arguments can sound tidy because every part reinforces the same point, but they do not add independent support.
LogicLens helps readers detect and review signals associated with circular reasoning and many related article-level patterns, including weak reasoning, loaded wording, missing context, framing, sourcing gaps, and manipulative persuasion.
Common signs
- The evidence restates the conclusion in different words.
- The argument depends on accepting the claim first.
- No outside support is offered.
Example
A writer says a policy is trustworthy because reliable leaders support it, and those leaders are reliable because they support trustworthy policies.
Reader check
Ask what independent evidence supports the claim.
FAQ
What is Circular Reasoning?
Circular reasoning happens when the argument's conclusion is already assumed inside the reasons offered for it.
Can LogicLens help detect circular reasoning?
LogicLens is built to help readers detect and review signals associated with this pattern and related forms of weak reasoning, loaded wording, missing context, framing, and manipulative persuasion in online content.
How do I spot circular reasoning while reading?
Ask what independent evidence supports the claim.
.png)
